Feature Comparison 

Feature CFP Competition Why CFP POL-E
Material Polyester (POL-E) Polypropylene blends Both poly for zero corrosion
Fiber Reinforced Yes No 8-10 times stronger
Crack Proof Yes No 8-10 times tougher
Expansion Rate 1/8" in 10'-0" thermo set plastic 1 7/8" in 10'-0" thermo plastic 1/15th that of poly and far more stable
Proven Durable Yes, since 1971 No, since 1988-94-96 Fewer problems
Sheets and Seams None Hundreds of feet in welded seams 1,000s of failures; 500:1 of POL-E
Fully Removable Bolt Down Lid Standard Welded on std., removable not available or cost huge $ Unbolt to remove debris for $ and time saved
Construction Seamless 1 piece shell Glue gun welded No weak points to fail
Fittings Flex designed CFP urethane Polypropylene thicker sheet inserts More designs, flexibility and durability
Weight Lightest on market Higher (More material used) Weight saved
Flow Rates Best in business Slower (More baffles) Better rates of flow
Baffle Systems NFPA for slosh control only NFPA but 2+ times more added for needed strength  Better flow; less weight
Gallons to Space Less size More baffles displace water Smallest size
Center of Gravity Lowest on market More baffles = higher tanks Better truck control
Versatile Shapes Molded to suit; virtually any Sheets are far less versatile Saves space; more flexible designs
Versatile Sizes Molded to suit Less versatile Saves space
Dump Valves Many available Few designs Less versatile
Foam Cells Many designs Boxed baffles Better draining designs
Maintenance and Trouble Free Proven; No tank ever replaced Many replaced and repaired Better reliability; 500:1
Tank Support Structure 1/2 that of poly 2 times more Less weight and cost
Warranty Support Best warranty on the market Lifetime warranty; actually 7 years or less with many loopholes Unlimited time plus $200/day in service guarantee
Warranty Transfer Option Yes; at the time of owner or chassis transfer No/Yes at manufacturers discretion only End user discretion with notification from DF in 60 days

Home